SIze Matters
Yesterday I went to buy some jeans. It was the first time in months that I'd done any clothes shopping. And I should explain that in the space of those months, I lost some weight, so when I went into the clothing store, I realized I had no idea what size I was anymore. I did know that my former "skinny" jeans--the jeans I used to wear when I didn't feel like sitting down or breathing--had gotten too big for me. But that was hardly enough information to go on in figuring out my new size. So in an attempt to save a little trying-on time, I asked a salesperson what size he thought I might be. He looked me up and down (guys, do NOT attempt this if you are not a clothing salesperson!) and said off-handedly, "I'd say a 2 or a 0."
I burst into incredulous laughter. "What?! No. Come on."
"Well, our sizes do tend to run a little big..."
"Yeah, but still," I said, and picked up a pair of pants in a size 4. Even those, I thought, would probably be too small.
But they weren't. Just the opposite, in fact.
So, to make a long story short, I bought my first pair of size 2 jeans yesterday. I am still kind of reeling from the shock. It's a pleasant sort of reeling, though. I mean, it's certainly better than reeling to something like "a piano fell out of the sky onto my car and smashed it to smithereens in a freak accident." You know?
PS For any readers of the male persuasion who are wondering what on earth a size 2 is, let me explain: No one knows. The methodology behind the sizing of women's clothing is a mystery on a par with quantum physics, and trying to figure it out is like trying to find the bottom of a black hole--impossible. See, a size 2 pair of jeans at the Gap might not be a size 2 at Ann Taylor or Express. Maybe it will be a size 4. Or a 6. Or maybe it will be a letter, like S. Be assured that the one thing it will NOT be is a logical reference to waist and inseam measurements. Because that would make way too much sense.
I burst into incredulous laughter. "What?! No. Come on."
"Well, our sizes do tend to run a little big..."
"Yeah, but still," I said, and picked up a pair of pants in a size 4. Even those, I thought, would probably be too small.
But they weren't. Just the opposite, in fact.
So, to make a long story short, I bought my first pair of size 2 jeans yesterday. I am still kind of reeling from the shock. It's a pleasant sort of reeling, though. I mean, it's certainly better than reeling to something like "a piano fell out of the sky onto my car and smashed it to smithereens in a freak accident." You know?
PS For any readers of the male persuasion who are wondering what on earth a size 2 is, let me explain: No one knows. The methodology behind the sizing of women's clothing is a mystery on a par with quantum physics, and trying to figure it out is like trying to find the bottom of a black hole--impossible. See, a size 2 pair of jeans at the Gap might not be a size 2 at Ann Taylor or Express. Maybe it will be a size 4. Or a 6. Or maybe it will be a letter, like S. Be assured that the one thing it will NOT be is a logical reference to waist and inseam measurements. Because that would make way too much sense.

3 Comments:
At 2:36 AM ,
eldila said...
Addendum to the PS: It's even worse when you try to buy clothes in other countries...UK sizes, although on the same random even-number scheme (except that American 'juniors' sizes are odd numbers...), are one to two sizes smaller than in the US. And then on the continent they have the audacity to do it in centimeters--size 40 etc.!! Sometimes it's hard to be a woman.
At 9:32 AM ,
grackyfrogg said...
size 40!!! cruel and unusual, that's what that is, eldila. and i had to laugh, being reminded of the time i was in thailand in 2002, and needing to buy a bathing suit in that land of very tiny people... the XXL was almost too small!!! i couldn't believe it.
yeah, shopping for clothes = ugh.
At 1:00 AM ,
P said...
seriously... is it cause guys are logical and so 34"x36" makes sense and girls are illogical so 2 does (or doesn't depending on your point of view) make sense?
oops, did I just stereotype both genders in a male chauvinistic sexist pig way?
*runs for cover*
love you Frogg! ;-)
Post a Comment
<< Home